Rivista di Diritto del Risparmio
Gli oneri istruttori in tema di fideiussioni ABI alla luce delle Sezioni Unite n. 41994/21.
Prime applicazioni e diverse visioni[*]
di Gladys CASTELLANO e Nicola STIAFFINI[**]
The following brief notes are intended to shed some light on the obligations of proof which the guarantor must bear in court in order to have the antitrust nullity action accepted.
More precisely, the evidence to be provided differs depending on whether the contested guarantee precedes the 2005 bank of Italy order or is subsequent to the order.
The judgment of the unified sections of the court of cassation of 30 December 21 leaves these aspects open, which must be resolved by the interpreter of the law.
_________________________
Rivista di Diritto del Risparmio
Aprile – Fascicolo n. 1/2022
Abstract.
The following brief notes are intended to shed some light on the obligations of proof which the guarantor must bear in court in order to have the antitrust nullity action accepted.
More precisely, the evidence to be provided differs depending on whether the contested guarantee precedes the 2005 bank of Italy order or is subsequent to the order.
The judgment of the unified sections of the court of cassation of 30 December 21 leaves these aspects open, which must be resolved by the interpreter of the law.
____________________________
[*] Contributo approvato dai referee.
[**] Gladys Castellano è Avvocato cassazionista, del Foro di Bergamo, specializzata in diritto dell’unione europea fondatrice ed autrice del sito fideiussioninulle.it. Nicola Stiaffini è Avvocato cassazionista, del Foro di Livorno, esperto in diritto bancario e finanziario fondatore e autore del sito fideiussioninulle.it.
Rivista di Diritto del Risparmio
Gli oneri istruttori in tema di fideiussioni ABI alla luce delle Sezioni Unite n. 41994/21.
Prime applicazioni e diverse visioni[*]
di Gladys CASTELLANO e Nicola STIAFFINI[**]
The following brief notes are intended to shed some light on the obligations of proof which the guarantor must bear in court in order to have the antitrust nullity action accepted.
More precisely, the evidence to be provided differs depending on whether the contested guarantee precedes the 2005 bank of Italy order or is subsequent to the order.
The judgment of the unified sections of the court of cassation of 30 December 21 leaves these aspects open, which must be resolved by the interpreter of the law.
_________________________
Rivista di Diritto del Risparmio
Aprile – Fascicolo n. 1/2022
Abstract.
The following brief notes are intended to shed some light on the obligations of proof which the guarantor must bear in court in order to have the antitrust nullity action accepted.
More precisely, the evidence to be provided differs depending on whether the contested guarantee precedes the 2005 bank of Italy order or is subsequent to the order.
The judgment of the unified sections of the court of cassation of 30 December 21 leaves these aspects open, which must be resolved by the interpreter of the law.
____________________________
[*] Contributo approvato dai referee.
[**] Gladys Castellano è Avvocato cassazionista, del Foro di Bergamo, specializzata in diritto dell’unione europea fondatrice ed autrice del sito fideiussioninulle.it. Nicola Stiaffini è Avvocato cassazionista, del Foro di Livorno, esperto in diritto bancario e finanziario fondatore e autore del sito fideiussioninulle.it.
Seguici sui social:
✉Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter settimanale✉
Condividi articolo:
Info sull'autore